<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes from Skeptical Inquirer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticum.com/notes-from-skeptical-inquirer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticum.com/notes-from-skeptical-inquirer/</link>
	<description>A Godless Skeptic's Notes on Liberty, Religion, Society, and More...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[johnny]]></title>
		<link>http://skepticum.com/notes-from-skeptical-inquirer/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticum.com/?p=86#comment-165</guid>
		<description>I liked the part about "consistent" vs. "selective" skepticism.  It is true that no one can be completely consistent in their skepticism, but I do think that it is an ideal that true skeptics should aim at.   As you say,

&lt;i&gt;Ironically, the authors are being skeptical of their own skepticism… That’s the true definition of a skeptic.&lt;/i&gt;

-dido</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the part about &#8220;consistent&#8221; vs. &#8220;selective&#8221; skepticism.  It is true that no one can be completely consistent in their skepticism, but I do think that it is an ideal that true skeptics should aim at.   As you say,</p>
<p><i>Ironically, the authors are being skeptical of their own skepticism… That’s the true definition of a skeptic.</i></p>
<p>-dido</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
